Porkers.co.uk - Porsche discussion forum



Forum Home > DROVE EVORA, CAYMAN NEEDS TO IMPROVE TO BEAT IT. < Post ReplyReport Abuse
1 2 3 4 5 6

Author

Discussion

heebeegeetee
13316 posts
85 months
 Thursday 15th October 2009  Reply with quote
shoestring7 said:
heebeegeetee said:
I have sat in an Evora though, so i also know that there is no chance whatsoever of sitting adults in one as shown in that pic, none whatsoever.
I was wondering if anyone would spot the driver's invisible seat!

SS7
That's it! That's how they've done it, they've took the seats out. laugh


jackwood
629 posts
45 months
 Thursday 15th October 2009  Reply with quote
The lack of dealerships is also a thorn in the Lotus side. Without a dealer within 20 minutes of my home or work, I couldn't even justify the thought of something like the Evora. Especially if the build quality and issues are anywhere near comparible with my mates Elise! Doing 15-18k miles per year I'd need to know my car was capable of handling those kind of miles.


evo4a
81 posts
18 months
 Thursday 15th October 2009  Reply with quote
I test drove both cars, I bought the Evora, spending that sort of money (and they are both very similar priced) I wanted a car which made me grin like a loony when I drove it, only the Evora did that, just drives like its on rails, believe me it's better than the Cayman, took delivery a month ago and still can't wipe the grin off my face especially when I see a Cayman, I know for me I made the right decision.
But there's no right or wrong decision, it's just personal preferance and what you can afford.


Mikeyboy
2693 posts
72 months
 Thursday 15th October 2009  Reply with quote
mrdemon said:
"just made the Cayman S seem like a stripped out Elise S1"

wtf that's a funny quote if ever I saw one.



Roll on 2010 When Lotus will clearly make the Sports car to beat all sports cars at 60k with the gen 2 Evora 320+ Bhp and some electronics.

But FFS it has no ESP as they dont have the skill to put one in and is slower on the track than a TTRS let alone a Cayman S.
I won't talk about straight line speed where again it's the slower of the 3.

In this case you cannot say the Evora will have it in the corners ;-p it just lacks the power, roll on the next one ASAP.


Edited by mrdemon on Thursday 15th October 10:53
Who said that about the elise S1? strange thing to have said.
They do have ESP though its one of those sports options i think and I suspect the more powerful version (again why, it really doesn't need it and surely it'd get too close to the Esprit,) will have the adjustable version that they put on that track special thing.

And as for track times. I think that it is a common mistake when it comes to Lotus products that in fact the Lotus line up will mirror the Porshce one. It doesn't need the Evora to be a track specialist. It has two already. And they are cheaper than the Evora.



evo4a
81 posts
18 months
 Sunday 18th October 2009  Reply with quote
Country Boy said:
I've owned a total of 6 Lotus cars over the years, the last 2 being Elise's - the build quality was an issue on every car. There was no difference with the most recent S2 that I owned. I love driving but I was always frustrated with the flimsy, cheap, badly put together build quality, and issues with little things like the crappy in car entertainment and bin parts used in production. I know Lotus will try hard to fix these sort of issues with the Evora but they will never IMO ever get the build quality up to the benchmark with that of high volume car manufacturers. When I sit in my pride and joy I don't want to see bits of plastic coming adrift, and that's why I love my Porsche - nothing drops off, it's built to last, and it's never let me down.
Well I can only speak for myself but after sitting in a Boxster the other day the Evora build quality is way better and less plastic,


squeezebm
1179 posts
42 months
 Sunday 18th October 2009  Reply with quote
evo4a said:
Country Boy said:
I've owned a total of 6 Lotus cars over the years, the last 2 being Elise's - the build quality was an issue on every car. There was no difference with the most recent S2 that I owned. I love driving but I was always frustrated with the flimsy, cheap, badly put together build quality, and issues with little things like the crappy in car entertainment and bin parts used in production. I know Lotus will try hard to fix these sort of issues with the Evora but they will never IMO ever get the build quality up to the benchmark with that of high volume car manufacturers. When I sit in my pride and joy I don't want to see bits of plastic coming adrift, and that's why I love my Porsche - nothing drops off, it's built to last, and it's never let me down.
Well I can only speak for myself but after sitting in a Boxster the other day the Evora build quality is way better and less plastic,
mmmmmmmmmm laughlaugh

So,not only is it slower,less powerfull it is also built better.Fanboys please this is getting silly Lotus have made a cracking car from what I've read but lets not go too starry eyed;)biggrin

Edited by squeezebm on Sunday 18th October 19:23



FrankCayman
580 posts
50 months
 Sunday 18th October 2009  Reply with quote
I loved my Elise, but wouldn't trust any Lotus to cover the 30k+ miles that I cover each year in my various Porsches.

Also, the Evora is fking ugly.




domster
7967 posts
107 months
 Sunday 18th October 2009  Reply with quote
The reality is that the Evora could be the best car in the world, but people will still buy a Cayman as they feel the resale will be better and it's a safer bet. Of course, Caymans are now available at very reasonable money, but look at what has happened to the Europa.

But it's great to hear about the Evora vs the Cayman and that it's got good build quality, superb handling as per most Lotuses etc. I hope it succeeds, but doubt it will ever worry even the limited-appeal Cayman from a sales point of view. The Evora probably deserves to do better than it will actually do.


Advertisement
mrdemon
1014 posts
102 months
 Sunday 18th October 2009  Reply with quote
"They do have ESP though its one of those sports options "


nope all the car has is traction control

NO ESP, that is due on the next one.

Try the wet handling track at silverstone in a Evora :-)

They show you just how good PSM is when you play in the Porsches.

Edited by mrdemon on Monday 19th October 00:02



TryHarder
566 posts
23 months
 Sunday 18th October 2009  Reply with quote
evo4a said:
Well I can only speak for myself but after sitting in a Boxster the other day the Evora build quality is way better and less plastic,
And then he woke up.........


evo4a
81 posts
18 months
 Sunday 18th October 2009  Reply with quote
TryHarder said:
evo4a said:
Well I can only speak for myself but after sitting in a Boxster the other day the Evora build quality is way better and less plastic,
And then he woke up.........
Yes your quite right..... I fell asleep in the Boxster... zzzz...zzzz wink


TOENHEEL
3468 posts
64 months
 Monday 19th October 2009  Reply with quote
FrankCayman said:
I loved my Elise, but wouldn't trust any Lotus to cover the 30k+ miles that I cover each year in my various Porsches.

Also, the Evora is fking ugly.
ok then.. loser you owned an S1 elise and thats the basis for how st Lotus are? You should try owning a modern Lotus a lot better..Yota lumps are cracking.

Edited by TOENHEEL on Monday 19th October 00:33


Edited by TOENHEEL on Monday 19th October 00:36



FrankCayman
580 posts
50 months
 Monday 19th October 2009  Reply with quote
TOENHEEL said:
FrankCayman said:
I loved my Elise, but wouldn't trust any Lotus to cover the 30k+ miles that I cover each year in my various Porsches.

Also, the Evora is fking ugly.
ok then.. loser you owned an S1 elise and thats the basis for how st Lotus are? You should try owning a modern Lotus a lot better..Yota lumps are cracking.

Edited by TOENHEEL on Monday 19th October 00:33


Edited by TOENHEEL on Monday 19th October 00:36
Who said I thought my Lotus or any Lotus was st? I merely stated that I doubt I could cover 90K in three years, like I do in my Porsches. I haven't looked at the Lotus service intervals, but are they 20K?

As for me saying the Evora is ugly - well, you can't get upset about that, surely? Rather harsh calling me a loser for simply having a different opinion to yours, don't you think?

Edited by FrankCayman on Monday 19th October 07:25


Edited by FrankCayman on Monday 19th October 07:47



TryHarder
566 posts
23 months
 Monday 19th October 2009  Reply with quote
evo4a said:
TryHarder said:
evo4a said:
Well I can only speak for myself but after sitting in a Boxster the other day the Evora build quality is way better and less plastic,
And then he woke up.........
Yes your quite right..... I fell asleep in the Boxster... zzzz...zzzz wink
LOL, fair play, but you must have sat in a different one to me if you think the quality is better than Porsche. Don't get me wrong I have always been a Lotus fan but I don't think you can or should compare and I don't think Lotus would want you too. Lotus is something on its own and special in its own right... like you said IMO.


TOENHEEL
3468 posts
64 months
 Monday 19th October 2009  Reply with quote
FrankCayman said:
TOENHEEL said:
FrankCayman said:
I loved my Elise, but wouldn't trust any Lotus to cover the 30k+ miles that I cover each year in my various Porsches.

Also, the Evora is fking ugly.
ok then.. loser you owned an S1 elise and thats the basis for how st Lotus are? You should try owning a modern Lotus a lot better..Yota lumps are cracking.

Edited by TOENHEEL on Monday 19th October 00:33


Edited by TOENHEEL on Monday 19th October 00:36
Who said I thought my Lotus or any Lotus was st? I merely stated that I doubt I could cover 90K in three years, like I do in my Porsches. I haven't looked at the Lotus service intervals, but are they 20K?

As for me saying the Evora is ugly - well, you can't get upset about that, surely? Rather harsh calling me a loser for simply having a different opinion to yours, don't you think?

Edited by FrankCayman on Monday 19th October 07:25


Edited by FrankCayman on Monday 19th October 07:47
Maybe a tad harsh but your comments led me to believe that you thought the Lotus was unreliable..our 987 porsche had complete engine failure at around 30k miles having owned it from new so forgive me for not thinking that Porsches are all that reliable.


chris7676
1186 posts
57 months
 Monday 19th October 2009  Reply with quote
Fair point TOENHEEL. It seems there is a weird fashion nowadays to assess reliability by subjective feeling of interior quality and other similar things...


ZeroH
1733 posts
26 months
 Thursday 19th November 2009  Reply with quote
mrdemon said:
"They do have ESP though its one of those sports options "


nope all the car has is traction control

NO ESP, that is due on the next one.

Try the wet handling track at silverstone in a Evora :-)

They show you just how good PSM is when you play in the Porsches.

Edited by mrdemon on Monday 19th October 00:02
ESP is due next yr on Evora. Not that the car needs it... utterly communicative... wet handling track in an Evora would be a joy.

The traction control is extremely clever in fact with the ability to detect and neutralise understeer.... it also has a electronic differential lock providing for fanastic traction.


Have driven Cayman gen2 at silverstone, today I drove Evora on road and track... there is no question that Lotus has hit the bullseye... sorry Cayman owners... even modded Cayman owners (sorry Shan !) do not possess a car that drives as well.

My thoughts are that;
i) it steers better (beautiful weighting, great information of whats underfoot, immediate response) than any porsche Ive driven (incl 7GT3, 993c4s, 6tt, 7tt, cayman 1&2, 986/987 etc etc).. in fact only car I've driven with a more direct feel to what the front wheels are doing is the lotus one-eleven, and that doesnt really count as a road car imo,
ii) amazing compliance yet at the same time the car feels 100% track fit... amazing compromise that Lotus has found that is simply beyond the Cayman ime,
iii) actually a very well designed and easy to use interior with supportive and comfortable seats.
iv) This car can soak up track punishment - you won't find the limits of its brakes, and it feels almost as fit for track as the elise, which is quite an achievement considering its on-road ability.

Negatives include:
i) uninspiring engine... should it be punchier, yes, however, fact is that on road, if you utilise 100% of its acceleration across a challenging b road - such is the car's chassis competence, i don't believe you'll be overtaken by anything this side of a turbo. On track theres no doubt more power could be easily accomodated by the chassis and this can lead you to wanting more.
ii) gearshift is long of throw and less precise than it could be.
iii) As already mentioned the gear ratio's are quite long... rectified by choosing the shorter ratio box.
iv) It doesnt feel quite as solid as a Porsche... can't fault the materials per say or even interior finish (no squeeks / rattles) but maybe its just the way the door shuts, or the general feel.. its intangible, can't put my finger on it... maybe its just perception ?
v) brakes grabby at top of travel - porsche progression is better.
vi) terrible rear view, albeit reversing camera available and wing mirrors are big.

Would I buy one ? Well not as a replacement for the turbo, but potentially when/if they release a higher performance engine.... and once I've seen how the residuals perform.






jackal
6568 posts
119 months
 Thursday 19th November 2009  Reply with quote
ZeroH said:
i) it steers better (beautiful weighting, great information of whats underfoot, immediate response) than any porsche Ive driven (incl 7GT3, 993c4s, 6tt, 7tt, cayman 1&2, 986/987 etc etc)..
it's a lotus though... TADTS

try a 4 pot esprit S4S for assisted steering feel, or a basic 1.8 elise S1 or an Elan




ZeroH
1733 posts
26 months
 Thursday 19th November 2009  Reply with quote
jackal said:
ZeroH said:
i) it steers better (beautiful weighting, great information of whats underfoot, immediate response) than any porsche Ive driven (incl 7GT3, 993c4s, 6tt, 7tt, cayman 1&2, 986/987 etc etc)..
it's a lotus though... TADTS

try a 4 pot esprit S4S for assisted steering feel, or a basic 1.8 elise S1 or an Elan
Indeed my comparative experience relates mainly to more modern stuff - but for sure, Lotus has the whole "steering thing" locked down !


White-Bull
29 posts
17 months
 Thursday 19th November 2009  Reply with quote
I've too tried the Evora. It's up there on steering, ride and handling but it's motor is utterly gutless. Add that in to a trans from the Avensis and a ***t interior and it doesn't measure compare. Evo are out to lunch putting it as winner of eCoty v GT3. 3 out of 5 journos preferred the GT3 but they managed to fix the scores so that the Evora won. Shame on you Evo.


1 2 3 4 5 6
Forum Home > DROVE EVORA, CAYMAN NEEDS TO IMPROVE TO BEAT IT. < Post Reply

Porkers.co.uk is part of the PistonHeads network