Author | Discussion |
heebeegeetee 13316 posts 85 months | Thursday 15th October 2009 
shoestring7 said:
heebeegeetee said:
I have sat in an Evora though, so i also know that there is no chance whatsoever of sitting adults in one as shown in that pic, none whatsoever. I was wondering if anyone would spot the driver's invisible seat! SS7 That's it! That's how they've done it, they've took the seats out. 
|
jackwood 629 posts 45 months | Thursday 15th October 2009 
The lack of dealerships is also a thorn in the Lotus side. Without a dealer within 20 minutes of my home or work, I couldn't even justify the thought of something like the Evora. Especially if the build quality and issues are anywhere near comparible with my mates Elise! Doing 15-18k miles per year I'd need to know my car was capable of handling those kind of miles.
|
evo4a 81 posts 18 months | Thursday 15th October 2009 
I test drove both cars, I bought the Evora, spending that sort of money (and they are both very similar priced) I wanted a car which made me grin like a loony when I drove it, only the Evora did that, just drives like its on rails, believe me it's better than the Cayman, took delivery a month ago and still can't wipe the grin off my face especially when I see a Cayman, I know for me I made the right decision. But there's no right or wrong decision, it's just personal preferance and what you can afford.
|
Mikeyboy 2693 posts 72 months | Thursday 15th October 2009 
mrdemon said:
"just made the Cayman S seem like a stripped out Elise S1"
wtf that's a funny quote if ever I saw one.
Roll on 2010 When Lotus will clearly make the Sports car to beat all sports cars at 60k with the gen 2 Evora 320+ Bhp and some electronics.
But FFS it has no ESP as they dont have the skill to put one in and is slower on the track than a TTRS let alone a Cayman S. I won't talk about straight line speed where again it's the slower of the 3.
In this case you cannot say the Evora will have it in the corners ;-p it just lacks the power, roll on the next one ASAP.
Who said that about the elise S1? strange thing to have said. They do have ESP though its one of those sports options i think and I suspect the more powerful version (again why, it really doesn't need it and surely it'd get too close to the Esprit,) will have the adjustable version that they put on that track special thing. And as for track times. I think that it is a common mistake when it comes to Lotus products that in fact the Lotus line up will mirror the Porshce one. It doesn't need the Evora to be a track specialist. It has two already. And they are cheaper than the Evora.
|
evo4a 81 posts 18 months | Sunday 18th October 2009 
Country Boy said:
I've owned a total of 6 Lotus cars over the years, the last 2 being Elise's - the build quality was an issue on every car. There was no difference with the most recent S2 that I owned. I love driving but I was always frustrated with the flimsy, cheap, badly put together build quality, and issues with little things like the crappy in car entertainment and bin parts used in production. I know Lotus will try hard to fix these sort of issues with the Evora but they will never IMO ever get the build quality up to the benchmark with that of high volume car manufacturers. When I sit in my pride and joy I don't want to see bits of plastic coming adrift, and that's why I love my Porsche - nothing drops off, it's built to last, and it's never let me down. Well I can only speak for myself but after sitting in a Boxster the other day the Evora build quality is way better and less plastic,
|
squeezebm 1179 posts 42 months | Sunday 18th October 2009 
evo4a said:
Country Boy said:
I've owned a total of 6 Lotus cars over the years, the last 2 being Elise's - the build quality was an issue on every car. There was no difference with the most recent S2 that I owned. I love driving but I was always frustrated with the flimsy, cheap, badly put together build quality, and issues with little things like the crappy in car entertainment and bin parts used in production. I know Lotus will try hard to fix these sort of issues with the Evora but they will never IMO ever get the build quality up to the benchmark with that of high volume car manufacturers. When I sit in my pride and joy I don't want to see bits of plastic coming adrift, and that's why I love my Porsche - nothing drops off, it's built to last, and it's never let me down. Well I can only speak for myself but after sitting in a Boxster the other day the Evora build quality is way better and less plastic, mmmmmmmmmm   So,not only is it slower,less powerfull it is also built better.Fanboys please this is getting silly Lotus have made a cracking car from what I've read but lets not go too starry eyed;) 
|
FrankCayman 580 posts 50 months | Sunday 18th October 2009 
I loved my Elise, but wouldn't trust any Lotus to cover the 30k+ miles that I cover each year in my various Porsches. Also, the Evora is f  king ugly.
|
domster 7967 posts 107 months | Sunday 18th October 2009 
The reality is that the Evora could be the best car in the world, but people will still buy a Cayman as they feel the resale will be better and it's a safer bet. Of course, Caymans are now available at very reasonable money, but look at what has happened to the Europa.
But it's great to hear about the Evora vs the Cayman and that it's got good build quality, superb handling as per most Lotuses etc. I hope it succeeds, but doubt it will ever worry even the limited-appeal Cayman from a sales point of view. The Evora probably deserves to do better than it will actually do.
| Advertisement
|
mrdemon 1014 posts 102 months | Sunday 18th October 2009 
"They do have ESP though its one of those sports options "
nope all the car has is traction control
NO ESP, that is due on the next one.
Try the wet handling track at silverstone in a Evora :-)
They show you just how good PSM is when you play in the Porsches.
|
TryHarder 566 posts 23 months | Sunday 18th October 2009 
evo4a said:
Well I can only speak for myself but after sitting in a Boxster the other day the Evora build quality is way better and less plastic, And then he woke up.........
|
evo4a 81 posts 18 months | Sunday 18th October 2009 
TryHarder said:
evo4a said:
Well I can only speak for myself but after sitting in a Boxster the other day the Evora build quality is way better and less plastic, And then he woke up......... Yes your quite right..... I fell asleep in the Boxster... zzzz...zzzz 
|
TOENHEEL 3468 posts 64 months | Monday 19th October 2009 
FrankCayman said:
I loved my Elise, but wouldn't trust any Lotus to cover the 30k+ miles that I cover each year in my various Porsches. Also, the Evora is f  king ugly. ok then..  you owned an S1 elise and thats the basis for how s  t Lotus are? You should try owning a modern Lotus a lot better..Yota lumps are cracking.
|
FrankCayman 580 posts 50 months | Monday 19th October 2009 
TOENHEEL said:
FrankCayman said:
I loved my Elise, but wouldn't trust any Lotus to cover the 30k+ miles that I cover each year in my various Porsches. Also, the Evora is f  king ugly. ok then..  you owned an S1 elise and thats the basis for how s  t Lotus are? You should try owning a modern Lotus a lot better..Yota lumps are cracking.
Who said I thought my Lotus or any Lotus was s  t? I merely stated that I doubt I could cover 90K in three years, like I do in my Porsches. I haven't looked at the Lotus service intervals, but are they 20K? As for me saying the Evora is ugly - well, you can't get upset about that, surely? Rather harsh calling me a loser for simply having a different opinion to yours, don't you think?
|
TryHarder 566 posts 23 months | Monday 19th October 2009 
evo4a said:
TryHarder said:
evo4a said:
Well I can only speak for myself but after sitting in a Boxster the other day the Evora build quality is way better and less plastic, And then he woke up......... Yes your quite right..... I fell asleep in the Boxster... zzzz...zzzz  LOL, fair play, but you must have sat in a different one to me if you think the quality is better than Porsche. Don't get me wrong I have always been a Lotus fan but I don't think you can or should compare and I don't think Lotus would want you too. Lotus is something on its own and special in its own right... like you said IMO.
|
TOENHEEL 3468 posts 64 months | Monday 19th October 2009 
FrankCayman said:
TOENHEEL said:
FrankCayman said:
I loved my Elise, but wouldn't trust any Lotus to cover the 30k+ miles that I cover each year in my various Porsches. Also, the Evora is f  king ugly. ok then..  you owned an S1 elise and thats the basis for how s  t Lotus are? You should try owning a modern Lotus a lot better..Yota lumps are cracking.
Who said I thought my Lotus or any Lotus was s  t? I merely stated that I doubt I could cover 90K in three years, like I do in my Porsches. I haven't looked at the Lotus service intervals, but are they 20K? As for me saying the Evora is ugly - well, you can't get upset about that, surely? Rather harsh calling me a loser for simply having a different opinion to yours, don't you think?
Maybe a tad harsh but your comments led me to believe that you thought the Lotus was unreliable..our 987 porsche had complete engine failure at around 30k miles having owned it from new so forgive me for not thinking that Porsches are all that reliable.
|
chris7676 1186 posts 57 months | Monday 19th October 2009 
Fair point TOENHEEL. It seems there is a weird fashion nowadays to assess reliability by subjective feeling of interior quality and other similar things...
|
ZeroH 1733 posts 26 months | Thursday 19th November 2009 
mrdemon said:
"They do have ESP though its one of those sports options "
nope all the car has is traction control
NO ESP, that is due on the next one.
Try the wet handling track at silverstone in a Evora :-)
They show you just how good PSM is when you play in the Porsches.
ESP is due next yr on Evora. Not that the car needs it... utterly communicative... wet handling track in an Evora would be a joy. The traction control is extremely clever in fact with the ability to detect and neutralise understeer.... it also has a electronic differential lock providing for fanastic traction. Have driven Cayman gen2 at silverstone, today I drove Evora on road and track... there is no question that Lotus has hit the bullseye... sorry Cayman owners... even modded Cayman owners (sorry Shan !) do not possess a car that drives as well. My thoughts are that; i) it steers better (beautiful weighting, great information of whats underfoot, immediate response) than any porsche Ive driven (incl 7GT3, 993c4s, 6tt, 7tt, cayman 1&2, 986/987 etc etc).. in fact only car I've driven with a more direct feel to what the front wheels are doing is the lotus one-eleven, and that doesnt really count as a road car imo, ii) amazing compliance yet at the same time the car feels 100% track fit... amazing compromise that Lotus has found that is simply beyond the Cayman ime, iii) actually a very well designed and easy to use interior with supportive and comfortable seats. iv) This car can soak up track punishment - you won't find the limits of its brakes, and it feels almost as fit for track as the elise, which is quite an achievement considering its on-road ability. Negatives include: i) uninspiring engine... should it be punchier, yes, however, fact is that on road, if you utilise 100% of its acceleration across a challenging b road - such is the car's chassis competence, i don't believe you'll be overtaken by anything this side of a turbo. On track theres no doubt more power could be easily accomodated by the chassis and this can lead you to wanting more. ii) gearshift is long of throw and less precise than it could be. iii) As already mentioned the gear ratio's are quite long... rectified by choosing the shorter ratio box. iv) It doesnt feel quite as solid as a Porsche... can't fault the materials per say or even interior finish (no squeeks / rattles) but maybe its just the way the door shuts, or the general feel.. its intangible, can't put my finger on it... maybe its just perception ? v) brakes grabby at top of travel - porsche progression is better. vi) terrible rear view, albeit reversing camera available and wing mirrors are big. Would I buy one ? Well not as a replacement for the turbo, but potentially when/if they release a higher performance engine.... and once I've seen how the residuals perform.
|
jackal 6568 posts 119 months | Thursday 19th November 2009 
ZeroH said:
i) it steers better (beautiful weighting, great information of whats underfoot, immediate response) than any porsche Ive driven (incl 7GT3, 993c4s, 6tt, 7tt, cayman 1&2, 986/987 etc etc).. it's a lotus though... TADTS try a 4 pot esprit S4S for assisted steering feel, or a basic 1.8 elise S1 or an Elan
|
ZeroH 1733 posts 26 months | Thursday 19th November 2009 
jackal said:
ZeroH said:
i) it steers better (beautiful weighting, great information of whats underfoot, immediate response) than any porsche Ive driven (incl 7GT3, 993c4s, 6tt, 7tt, cayman 1&2, 986/987 etc etc).. it's a lotus though... TADTS try a 4 pot esprit S4S for assisted steering feel, or a basic 1.8 elise S1 or an Elan Indeed my comparative experience relates mainly to more modern stuff - but for sure, Lotus has the whole "steering thing" locked down !
|
White-Bull 29 posts 17 months | Thursday 19th November 2009 
I've too tried the Evora. It's up there on steering, ride and handling but it's motor is utterly gutless. Add that in to a trans from the Avensis and a ***t interior and it doesn't measure compare. Evo are out to lunch putting it as winner of eCoty v GT3. 3 out of 5 journos preferred the GT3 but they managed to fix the scores so that the Evora won. Shame on you Evo.
|